The top court is hearing a challenge
نوشته شده توسط : thrust pad bearing

  Chelameswar, Justice S. Abdul Nazeer had reserved the verdict on August 2 after hearing the matter for two weeks. Agrawal, Justice Rohinton Fali Nariman, Justice Abhay Manohar Sapre, Justice D.A. Puttaswamy, first Chairperson of National Commission for Protection of Child Rights and Magsaysay awardee Shanta Sinha, feminist Thrust Pad Bearings for sale researcher Kalyani Sen Menon, and others.After the nine judges bench decides whether right to privacy is a fundamental right or not, then a regular bench will hear the challenge to the validity of the Aadhaar scheme.

Ians feed.K. Bobde, Justice R. The hearing saw a partisan divide with the Centre and BJP-ruled Maharashtra and Gujarat contending that right to privacy was not a fundamental right and those ruled by the Congress Karnataka, Punjab, Himachal Pradesh, Puducherry and TMC in West Bengal asserting that privacy was a fundamental right.The petitioners included former Karnataka High Court Judge K.It was in this background that the nine-judges constitution bench heard the matter to examine the correctness or otherwise of the 1954 and 1962 judgments and the nature of the right to privacy whether fundamental or not.The Centre had contended that though after the mid-seventies several judgments by the benches of strength of two or three judges had held that right to privacy was fundamental but it was the judgment of 1954 and 1962 by the larger benches that holds the ground.S.The nine-judge Constitution bench comprising Chief Justice Jagdish Singh Khehar, Justice J.

 The top court is hearing a challenge to the Delhi High Courts September 23, 2016 order by which it allowed WhatsApp to roll out its new privacy policy but stopped it from sharing the data of its users collected up to September 25, 2016, with Facebook or any other related company.Hearing had commenced on July 19 and concluded on August 2.It is also likely to have a bearing on the challenge to WhatsApps new privacy policy. Chandrachud, Justice Sanjay Kishan Kaul, and Justice S.Y.The Unique Identification Authority of India too said that privacy was not a fundamental right and there were sufficient safeguards to protect data collected from the people their iris scan and finger prints.However, the Centre contested their position citing two judgments of 1954 (by eight judges) and 1962 (by six judges) which had held that the right to privacy was not a fundamental right.New Delhi, Aug 23 (IANS) The Supreme Court is likely to pronounce on Thursday whether right to privacy is a fundamental right that would have a bearing on the challenge to the validity of the Aadhaar scheme on the grounds of its being violative of the right to privacy.The entire issue was rooted in a reference by a three-judge bench that was hearing a challenge to the constitutional validity of the Aadhaar Scheme on the grounds of its being violative of the fundamental right to privacy





:: بازدید از این مطلب : 122
|
امتیاز مطلب : 0
|
تعداد امتیازدهندگان : 0
|
مجموع امتیاز : 0
تاریخ انتشار : سه شنبه 6 فروردين 1398 | نظرات ()
مطالب مرتبط با این پست
لیست
می توانید دیدگاه خود را بنویسید


نام
آدرس ایمیل
وب سایت/بلاگ
:) :( ;) :D
;)) :X :? :P
:* =(( :O };-
:B /:) =DD :S
-) :-(( :-| :-))
نظر خصوصی

 کد را وارد نمایید:

آپلود عکس دلخواه: